Library / Subject
Commercialisation, Pilots, FOAK & Scale
What changes when a technology moves from a pilot to a purchase, a first commercial project and repeat deployment?
A technology that works in a pilot still has a long way to go before anyone buys it at scale. This subject follows that journey. It covers what first-of-a-kind means in climate tech, how FOAK differs from a pilot, a demonstration and the nth plant, and why a successful pilot often fails to become a purchase.
It then goes into the project itself, the six cases a first commercial project has to make, the offtake agreements that support it, the many customers behind one plant, and how to present risk honestly to lenders and partners. The pieces draw on public projects in carbon removal, green steel, sustainable aviation fuel and recycling, alongside the capital conversations at The Decision Room in Zürich. A final map shows how the story changes from lab to market.
Start with what FOAK means, then read why pilots stall and why first plants are hard to finance.
Start here
What Is FOAK in Climate Tech? From Pilot to First Commercial Deployment
Why Successful Climate Tech Pilots Do Not Always Become Purchases
Why Are FOAK Climate Projects Hard to Finance? Risk, Ambiguity and the Missing Reference Class
More in this subject
How to Present FOAK Risk Without Pretending the Risk Is Gone
The First Plant Has More Than One Customer: Mapping the FOAK Decision System
From FOAK to NOAK: What the First Commercial Project Must Prove
FOAK vs Pilot vs Demonstration vs NOAK: What Is the Difference?
The FOAK Story System: Six Cases a First Commercial Project Has to Make
From Pilot Evidence to Project Evidence: What Changes at FOAK
Climate Tech Commercialisation Map: How the Story Changes From Lab to Market
What Is an Offtake Agreement and Why Does It Matter for FOAK Climate Tech?
Is a FOAK Project Fundable or Financeable? Why the Difference Matters
Biomanufacturing FOAK: What Makes the First Industrial Plant Different
Other subjects
Changemakers newsletter
New interviews and studio thinking, by email.
Founder and investor conversations, and what they show about how complex work gets understood.
01
02
03
04