01
02
03
04
05Sections
The guide in short
- Watch the cost of ambiguityTrack how often the team remakes the same explanation or the same choice.
- Check if you are too earlyDo customer learning first if ten good conversations could still change the proposition.
- Name the trigger that justifies investmentConfirm a trigger such as enterprise sales, a major raise or a change of strategy.
- Choose the smallest scope that solves itMatch the work to the problem, from a messaging reset to a full brand system.
- Face the harder problem firstGive missing evidence, weak economics and unproven fit their own fix outside brand work.
- Answer six questions before commissioningWrite down the expensive decision, stable parts, evidence, audiences, handover needs and owner.
A climate startup should invest in branding once it knows its customer, proposition and direction well enough for brand decisions to be reused across sales, hiring, partnerships and fundraising. If the product, buyer or route to market is still unknown, customer evidence comes first. The right scope depends on what has become expensive to leave unclear.
Watch the cost of ambiguity
Ambiguity can turn expensive before Series A or long after it. The signal to watch is repeated decision cost, the time the team spends making the same explanation or the same choice again because nothing settled it the first time.
The organisation is paying that cost if the CEO rewrites every deck, sales describes the product differently from the website, investors put the company in the wrong category or the visual system struggles to carry the evidence the business now has. Each of those is a decision about the company that has been left open and gets made again by whoever is in the meeting.
Too early, right time, overdue
Too early
You are still discovering who the customer is, which problem they will pay to solve or whether the product can deliver the claimed value. Ten good customer conversations could change the proposition. Do the learning first, and treat landing pages, founder outreach, small campaigns and sales calls as research. A polished identity built on an untested assumption makes the assumption more expensive. So does paid acquisition scaled around a proposition the team is still learning to explain.
Steffen Gerlach of Eeden, a textile recycling company, named the order he would choose now. In his interview with us he said one of the company’s biggest mistakes was not talking to potential customers early enough. “Today, I would have started that talking process earlier.”
Right time
The proposition is stabilising, several materials need to tell the same story and inconsistent communication is slowing important work. The company knows what it is and still needs a system for expressing it.
Koralo, a food-tech company we worked with, reached this point when its opportunity moved. It had set out to make a fish alternative and found a larger functional ingredient opportunity in the same technology. Before any design work started, its founder Sina said the storyline had to change first. The brief was a deck, and the first job was to settle what the company had become.
Overdue
The company has outgrown its seed-stage language. Every senior opportunity needs a custom explanation, the brand understates technical maturity, or teams stay consistent only when the founder steps in.
Triggers that justify investment
- A category or positioning decision keeps coming up in meetings and needs settling once.
- The company is entering enterprise or institutional sales, where credibility expectations change.
- A major raise, market entry or partnership programme needs consistent materials.
- The product portfolio has outgrown its old architecture.
- The company has merged, changed leadership or changed strategy.
- The website and deck hide important evidence.
Choose the smallest scope that solves the problem
Match the work to the problem
- Product changing materially every monthKeep the brand light and flexible.
- Category misunderstoodPositioning and narrative first.
- Visual system usable, proposition or hierarchy unclearA messaging reset.
- Brand works elsewhere, one investment or partnership decision is stuckA pitch diagnosis before any rebrand.
- Positioning clear, visual system weak or unable to scaleAn identity refresh may be enough.
- Strong substance, and a site that makes visitors reconstruct the caseInformation architecture and a website rebuild.
- Everything inconsistent and the company has maturedA full brand system, with strategy, narrative, identity and core materials moving together.
What brand work should leave behind
- A category and proposition the team can explain consistently.
- Audience priorities and the evidence each audience needs.
- A full narrative across the origin, purpose, vision, customer, product and impact stories.
- A visual system that works across web, decks, sales and hiring.
- Templates and rules internal teams can operate on their own.
- Clear ownership of future brand decisions.
Face the harder problem first
Missing evidence, weak economics, regulatory uncertainty, limited delivery capacity and unproven product-market fit each need their own fix, and brand work does not supply it. Good brand work can make those issues easier to see and keep them in view while the team solves them. Our piece When Better Communication Is the Wrong Answer covers how to tell which kind of problem you have.
Before you commission a project
- Which decision is expensive right now because the brand is unclear?
- Which parts of the proposition are stable?
- What customer evidence do we have?
- Which audiences matter over the next 18 months?
- What must the internal team be able to produce after handover?
- Who owns final decisions?
Tell us what needs to move.
Bring the brief if it is clear. If it is unclear, tell us where the work is stuck.
Bring us the problem